🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a bill raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful first step," said a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, interest built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the family of a young person who died after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, action is largely occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to copy Australia's lead, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, other nations are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies strike a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this international conversation unfolds, the steps of Australia and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.